linux-kernel - Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 0/3] x86: modify_ldt improvement, test, and config option

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <55B822B8.3090608@citrix.com>
Date:	Wed, 29 Jul 2015 01:47:52 +0100
From:	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>
To:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
Cc:	"security@...nel.org" <security@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>,
	Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 0/3] x86: modify_ldt improvement, test, and
 config option

On 29/07/2015 01:21, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Boris Ostrovsky
> <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com> wrote:
>> On 07/28/2015 01:07 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Andrew Cooper
>>> <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com> wrote:
>>>> I suspect that the set_ldt(NULL, 0) call hasn't reached Xen before
>>>> xen_free_ldt() is attempting to nab back the pages which Xen still has
>>>> mapped as an LDT.
>>>>
>>> I just instrumented it with yet more LSL instructions.  I'm pretty
>>> sure that set_ldt really is clearing at least LDT entry zero.
>>> Nonetheless the free_ldt call still oopses.
>>>
>> Yes, I added some instrumentation to the hypervisor and we definitely set
>> LDT to NULL before failing.
>>
>> -boris
> Looking at map_ldt_shadow_page: what keeps shadow_ldt_mapcnt from
> getting incremented once on each CPU at the same time if both CPUs
> fault in the same shadow LDT page at the same time?

Nothing, but that is fine.  If a page is in use in two vcpus LDTs, it is
expected to have a type refcount of 2.

> Similarly, what
> keeps both CPUs from calling get_page_type at the same time and
> therefore losing track of the page type reference count?

a cmpxchg() loop in the depths of __get_page_type().

>
> I don't see why vmalloc or vm_unmap_aliases would have anything to do
> with this, though.

Nor me.  I have compiled your branch and will see about reproducing the
issue myself tomorrow.

~Andrew
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/