[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZ5Kvc0LPeG_HAHwejoCRV4JRbpA2+zwNCAxTqzxdDYzQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 11:08:30 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: "rtc-linux@...glegroups.com" <rtc-linux@...glegroups.com>
Cc: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Deepak Saxena <dsaxena@...xity.net>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [rtc-linux] [PATCH] drivers/rtc/rtc-pl031.c: reset registers in
init flow
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 8:02 AM, Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org> wrote:
> When use rtc-pl031 for suspend test on Hisilicon's SoC Hi6220, Usually
> the data register (DR) will read back as value zero. So the suspend
> test code will set the match register (MR) for 10 seconds' timeout; But
> there have chance later will read back some random values from DR
> register; So finally miss with match value and will not trigger
> waken up event anymore.
>
> This issue can be dismissed by reset registers in initialization flow;
> And this code have no harm for ST's variant.
>
> Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
I don't understand this...
> + /* Init registers */
> + writel(0x0, ldata->base + RTC_LR);
This will reset the clock to jan 1st 1970 on every reboot.
The idea is that the RTC should *preserve* the system time
if you reboot the system, so NACK.
Usually userspace has a script using hwclock to read the
system time from the rtc to system time with hwclock -s
after userspace comes up. Likewise it writes it back with
hwclock -w before rebooting.
> + writel(0x0, ldata->base + RTC_DR);
This is a read-only register in the PL031 clean variant.
What do you want to achieve here? Is this register writeable
on the HiSilicon?
> + writel(0x0, ldata->base + RTC_IMSC);
OK
> + writel(RTC_BIT_AI, ldata->base + RTC_ICR);
So why do we want to have the alarm enabled by
default, before the kernel nor userspace has requested
it?
If your problem is with suspend/resume I suggest you work
on the [runtime]_suspend/resume hooks instead of probe().
Possibly you need to save/restore state across suspend/resume.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists