[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1507291351530.3825@nanos>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 13:53:52 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
cc: Taichi Kageyama <t-kageyama@...jp.nec.com>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com" <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-serial@...r.kernel.org" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"jslaby@...e.cz" <jslaby@...e.cz>,
"prarit@...hat.com" <prarit@...hat.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/3] genirq, serial: 8250: Workaround to avoid
irq=0 for console
On Wed, 29 Jul 2015, Peter Hurley wrote:
> On 07/29/2015 06:32 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Wed, 29 Jul 2015, Taichi Kageyama wrote:
> >> - Keep interrupt disabled on the CPU which is used to detect
> >> an interrupt during the timeout of autoconfig_irq().
> >> + Kick printk() on the CPU which detects interrupt
> >> from a console serial port.
> >
> > This is wrong to begin with. How is that supposed to work on an UP
> > machine? Not at all.
> >
> > So no, fix the code which has interrupts disabled accross autoprobing
> > and do not try to apply bandaids somewhere else.
>
> Like printk() from some unrelated driver?
If that's the cause for the wreckage then yes, we need a way to tell
the printk code not to call into the driver until that initialization
step is done. It's that simple.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists