[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150729152022.GC2743@mail.corp.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 11:20:23 -0400
From: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, Todd Broch <tbroch@...omium.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915: hide errors when probing for a
reverse display port
On Jul 28 2015 or thereabouts, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 12:03:28PM -0400, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> > We check the polarity of the attached dp, so it is normal to fail.
> > Do not send errors to the users.
>
> if (probe) DRM_DEBUG else DRM_ERROR is fairly offensive.
>
> It strikes me that you could make each of these functions report the
> failure to the caller (have the caller even do so error handling!) and
> as part of that have the caller report an error and so demote all of
> these to DRM_DEBUG_KMS().
Yes, sorry for that. I will change it to return an actual error code and
the error string if I still need to use these functions given Sivakumar
ideas.
>
> Who knows, actually doing some error handling may make monitor training
> more reliable! Or we may even get carried away and report the failure
> all the way back to userspace.
That would be a very good improvement indeed. But I can already tell you
that I will not do it by myself, I already have too much on my plate.
I'll do my share for this feature, but don't count on me for the whole
error handling rewrite :)
Cheers,
Benjamin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists