[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150729153135.GW8100@esperanza>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 18:31:35 +0300
From: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>
To: Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>
CC: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andres Lagar-Cavilla <andreslc@...gle.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
"Pavel Emelyanov" <xemul@...allels.com>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<cgroups@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm v9 0/8] idle memory tracking
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 08:08:22AM -0700, Michel Lespinasse wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 7:45 AM, Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>
> wrote:
> > Page table scan approach has the inherent problem - it ignores unmapped
> > page cache. If a workload does a lot of read/write or map-access-unmap
> > operations, we won't be able to even roughly estimate its wss.
>
> You can catch that in mark_page_accessed on those paths, though.
Actually, the problem here is how to find an unmapped page cache page
*to mark it idle*, not to mark it accessed.
Thanks,
Vladimir
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists