[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFzM4Y4Bfu1vwFF_eKj5uRFVpEgQZLby4U-zSBBPBOTVuQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 10:47:17 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] x86/vm86: Use the normal pt_regs area for vm86
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com> wrote:
>
> I think I remember now what the issue was. Since entering vm86 mode
> uses force_iret(), the work_pending code path was being taken. I had
> to move the call to save_v86_state out of here to handle_signal(),
> otherwise it would just restore the 32-bit regs and exit the syscall
> without ever entering vm86 mode. But that meant that the test for
> kernel CS was seeing the vm86 regs instead of 32-bit regs, and was
> failing because it didn't account for the VM bit (if the real-mode CS
> looked like RPL 0). A fault would get stuck in a loop because it
> couldn't exit to the signal handling code.
Hmm. I think we'd want a big comment about that code then, and how it
is only used for user-space (including vm86 mode).
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists