linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] toshiba_acpi: Remove "*not supported" feature prints

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150729035010.GD3171@vmdeb7>
Date:	Tue, 28 Jul 2015 20:50:10 -0700
From:	Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>
To:	Azael Avalos <coproscefalo@...il.com>
Cc:	platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] toshiba_acpi: Remove "*not supported" feature
 prints

Hi Azael,

On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 07:22:26PM -0600, Azael Avalos wrote:
> Currently the driver prints "*not supported" if any of the features
> queried are in fact not supported, let us print the available
> features instead.
> 
> This patch removes all instances pr_info printing "*not supported",
> and add a new function called "print_supported_features", which will
> print the available laptop features.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Azael Avalos <coproscefalo@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c
> index e164926..e24f0f5 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c
> @@ -477,13 +477,10 @@ static void toshiba_illumination_set(struct led_classdev *cdev,
>  	state = brightness ? 1 : 0;
>  	result = sci_write(dev, SCI_ILLUMINATION, state);
>  	sci_close(dev);
> -	if (result == TOS_FAILURE) {
> +	if (result == TOS_FAILURE)
>  		pr_err("ACPI call for illumination failed\n");
> +	else if (result == TOS_NOT_SUPPORTED)
>  		return;

And otherwise.... return. So this last if test doesn't do anything. If you feel
the context is relevant, consider just including it as a comment.

Thanks,

-- 
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/