lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 11:02:48 +0530 From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net> Cc: Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk> Subject: Re: [Update 2x][PATCH 7/7] cpufreq: Separate CPU device registration from CPU online On 29-07-15, 03:03, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > +static int cpufreq_add_dev(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif) > +{ > + unsigned cpu = dev->id; > + int ret; > + > + dev_dbg(dev, "%s: adding CPU%u\n", __func__, cpu); > + > + if (cpu_online(cpu)) { > + ret = cpufreq_online(cpu); I will do return right here ... > + } else { ... and this else will not be required anymore. > + /* > + * A hotplug notifier will follow and we will handle it as CPU > + * online then. For now, just create the sysfs link, unless > + * there is no policy or the link is already present. > + */ > + struct cpufreq_policy *policy = per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data, cpu); > + > + ret = policy && !cpumask_test_and_set_cpu(cpu, policy->real_cpus) > + ? add_cpu_dev_symlink(policy, cpu) : 0; > + } > + > + return ret; > +} Looks good otherwise. Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> -- viresh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists