linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] igb/ixgbe: Fix ordering of SR-IOV teardown

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20150729.143141.657802657776347202.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Wed, 29 Jul 2015 14:31:41 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	alex.williamson@...hat.com
Cc:	intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] igb/ixgbe: Fix ordering of SR-IOV teardown

From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 13:33:07 -0600

> I expect that's because of this patch that's in Jeff's dev-queue branch:
> 
> http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/jkirsher/next-queue.git/commit/?h=dev-queue&id=ddf766a812a13eca1116b5905e902184904266f9
> 
> I based these patches off that branch, assuming they'd take the same
> route and avoid the merge conflict.  If you'd rather take these, I'll be
> happy to respin.  Apologies for not noting the base branch in the
> series.  Thanks,

No, that's fine, this would normally go via Jeff's tree anyways.

I just didn't see him take it so I assumed that it should go via me.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/