[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DDAFF52F-3277-4645-9DA9-62C388DA445C@xmission.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 17:21:10 -0500
From: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
To: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@...com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Scott J Norton <scott.norton@...com>,
Douglas Hatch <doug.hatch@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] proc: change proc_subdir_lock to a rwlock
Two quick questions.
- What motivates this work? Are you seeing lots of
parallel reads on proc?
- Why not rcu? Additions and removal of proc generic
files is very rare. Conversion to rcu for reads should
perform better and not take much more work.
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists