[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55B9D017.2090107@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 09:19:51 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Steve Rutherford <srutherford@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
alex.williamson@...hat.com, yang.z.zhang@...el.com,
srutherford@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: x86: store IOAPIC-handled vectors in each VCPU
On 30/07/2015 05:55, Steve Rutherford wrote:
> > static void vcpu_scan_ioapic(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > {
> > - u64 eoi_exit_bitmap[4];
> > -
> > if (!kvm_apic_hw_enabled(vcpu->arch.apic))
> > return;
> >
> > - memset(eoi_exit_bitmap, 0, 32);
> > + memset(vcpu->arch.eoi_exit_bitmap, 0, 256 / 8);
> >
> > - kvm_ioapic_scan_entry(vcpu, eoi_exit_bitmap);
> > - kvm_x86_ops->load_eoi_exitmap(vcpu, eoi_exit_bitmap);
> > + kvm_ioapic_scan_entry(vcpu, vcpu->arch.eoi_exit_bitmap);
> Nit: Does scan entry still need to carry around the pointer to the bitmap?
IIRC I was copying what you did in your patch, but I also think it's
better this way. The IOAPIC has no business in the vcpu structure's
fields; it only needs it in order to pass vcpu to kvm_apic_match_dest.
Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists