linux-kernel - Re: [Bugfix] x86, irq: Fix regression caused by commit d32932d02e18

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1507301007470.3825@nanos>
Date:	Thu, 30 Jul 2015 10:33:52 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>
cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
	Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Bugfix] x86, irq: Fix regression caused by commit
 d32932d02e18

On Thu, 30 Jul 2015, Jiang Liu wrote:

> Commit d32932d02e18 ("x86/irq: Convert IOAPIC to use hierarchical
> irqdomain interfaces") introduced a regression when converting IOAPIC
> to hierarchy irqdomain, which sets wrong irq flow handler for IOAPIC
> pins on Surface Pro 3 and causes failure when detecting I2C controllers.
> It's caused by using stale attribute value when setting up IOAPIC pins.
> With this patch applied, all IOAPIC IRQ configuration are identical
> to v4.1 on Surface Pro 3.
>  
> Fixes: d32932d02e18 ("x86/irq: Convert IOAPIC to use hierarchical irqdomain interfaces")
> Reported-by: Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>
> Tested-and-reported-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> Hi Matt,
> 	Could you please help to test this patch?
> Thanks!
> Gerry
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
> index 845dc0df2002..206052e55517 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
> @@ -943,7 +943,7 @@ static bool mp_check_pin_attr(int irq, struct irq_alloc_info *info)
>  	 */
>  	if (irq < nr_legacy_irqs() && data->count == 1) {
>  		if (info->ioapic_trigger != data->trigger)
> -			mp_register_handler(irq, data->trigger);
> +			mp_register_handler(irq, info->ioapic_trigger);
>  		data->entry.trigger = data->trigger = info->ioapic_trigger;
>  		data->entry.polarity = data->polarity = info->ioapic_polarity;

Pretty obvious, but I was staring at this very piece of code for hours
without spotting it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/