lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150730085347.GF9319@x1>
Date:	Thu, 30 Jul 2015 09:53:47 +0100
From:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:	Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>
Cc:	Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
	Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
	Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>,
	Peter Tyser <ptyser@...-inc.com>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	Zha Qipeng <qipeng.zha@...el.com>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] iTCO_wdt: Expose watchdog properties using
 platform data

On Wed, 29 Jul 2015, Matt Fleming wrote:

> On Wed, 29 Jul, at 04:35:56PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> > 
> > For my own reference (I assume this will go through the MFD tree):
> >   Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
> 
> Great, thanks Lee!
> 
> I've no strong opinion on which tree these 3 patches go through but at
> the very least patches 1 and 2 need to go through the same tree to avoid
> build breakage (since PATCH 1 introduces 'struct itco_wdt_platform_data'
> which is used in PATCH 2).
> 
> For reference, the other patches are here,
> 
>   https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1438171844-24861-3-git-send-email-matt@codeblueprint.co.uk
>   https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1438171844-24861-4-git-send-email-matt@codeblueprint.co.uk

Obviously this makes things more difficult.  Once you have the other
Acks you need, I suggest you re-submit the set using --threaded, so we
can all see what's going on.

FYI: I usually do this as a matter of course, as separated patches are
a pain to manage, particularly if there are dependencies between them.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ