[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGCh1+kvLnoW1C-sCaT85=-J5B7DcqOx-K9etRvoh3AfbN0J9w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 10:37:23 +0100
From: G Gregory <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@...aro.org>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@...aro.org>,
QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@...gnu.org>,
lkml - Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Shannon Zhao <zhaoshenglong@...wei.com>,
Igor Mammedov <imammedo@...hat.com>,
Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] arm: change vendor ID for virtio-mmio
On 30 July 2015 at 10:24, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@...aro.org> wrote:
> On 30 July 2015 at 09:04, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 09:23:20AM +0800, Shannon Zhao wrote:
>>>
>>> Why do we drop the previous way using "QEMUXXXX"? Something I missed?
>>
>> So that guests that bind to this interface will work fine with non QEMU
>> implementations of virtio-mmio.
>
> I don't understand this sentence. If there are pre-existing
> non-QEMU virtio-mmio implementations, then they're using
> LNRO0005, and we should use it too.
The only one I have come across is the ARM FVP model, and it happens
that I chose the ID and maintain the tables for that so I can change
it.
Graeme
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists