[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150730105154.GN11162@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 11:51:54 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: Michal Suchanek <hramrach@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
Padmavathi Venna <padma.kvr@...il.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] dt: spi: s3c64xx: add compatible to
controller-data
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 09:50:51AM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> Since you have to patch your DTs anyway, how about putting your
> partitions in a subnode and patch the ofpart code to parse this subnode
> if it is present (see the following patch).
This is the best idea, yes - if we're changing the DT for the system
anyway then making a sane binding and using that seems better than
trying to mitigate problems with the old bindings.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists