[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150730121435.GJ25159@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 14:14:35 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
adrian.hunter@...el.com, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
acme@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] perf/x86/intel/pt: Add new timing packet enables
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 02:57:17PM +0300, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> writes:
>
> > On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 04:34:08PM +0300, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
> >> +#define PT_CONFIG_MASK (RTIT_CTL_TSC_EN | \
> >> + RTIT_CTL_DISRETC | \
> >> + RTIT_CTL_CYCLEACC | \
> >> + RTIT_CTL_MTC_EN | \
> >> + RTIT_CTL_MTC_RANGE | \
> >> + RTIT_CTL_CYC_THRESH | \
> >> + RTIT_CTL_PSB_FREQ)
> >>
> >
> > #define RTIT_CTL_CYC (RTIT_CTL_CYCLEACC | \
> > RTIT_CTL_CYC_THRESH | \
> > RTIT_CTL_PSB_FREQ)
>
> PSB_FREQ is not, strictly speaking, related to cycle accurate mode. Both
> adjustable psb frequency and cycle accurate mode settings are enumerated
> with the same CPUID bit, but they really do different things unrelated
> to one another.
RTIT_CTL_CYC_PSB then, to match the CPUID bit name?
> >> + if (config & (RTIT_CTL_MTC_EN | RTIT_CTL_MTC_RANGE)) {
> >
> > if (config & RTIT_CTL_MTC) {
> >
> > Would that make sense?
>
> To me either way is fine. Want me to respin it?
Please.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists