[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150730133120.GA3208@x1>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 14:31:20 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...inux.com, jassisinghbrar@...il.com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] mailbox: Add support for ST's Mailbox IP
On Thu, 30 Jul 2015, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On do, 2015-07-30 at 12:45 +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Wed, 29 Jul 2015, Paul Bolle wrote:
> > > Besides, if I read sti_max_probe() correctly, without OF support
> > > loading
> > > this module won't accomplish much. So what would another way of
> > > autoloading this module buy you?
> >
> > I think this line can be safely removed.
>
> Looking at this patch a little more I notice there's no line reading
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, sti_mailbox_match);
>
> The three mailbox drivers that currently support OF do have such a line.
> So "another way of autoloading" was rather sloppy as now I don't see how
> this driver, if build as a module, will get auto-loaded. Maybe there's
> an auto-loading mechanism that I'm not aware of here. Or perhaps auto
> -loading is not needed.
>
> Similar question for patch 5/6 and the lack of a line reading
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mbox_test_match);
Yes, both of those lines should be present.
FYW, I don't test these drivers as modules and have no desire to. I
always build everything into a single kernel binary, so any feedback
regarding the module enabling code is appreciated.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists