[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55BA35D2.5040307@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 15:33:54 +0100
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
To: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
"nicolas.pitre@...aro.org" <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irqchip/gic: Only allow the primary GIC to set the CPU
map
On 30/07/15 15:11, Jon Hunter wrote:
> The gic_init_bases() function initialises an array that stores the mapping
> between the GIC and CPUs. This array is a global array that is
> unconditionally initialised on every call to gic_init_bases(). Although,
> it is not common for there to be more than one GIC instance, there are
> some devices that do support nested GIC controllers and gic_init_bases()
> can be called more than once.
>
> A 2nd call to gic_init_bases() will clear the previous CPU mapping and
> will only setup the mapping again for the CPU calling gic_init_bases().
> Fix this by only allowing the CPU map to be configured for the primary GIC.
>
> For secondary GICs the CPU map is not relevant because these GICs do not
> directly route the interrupts to the main CPU(s) but to other GICs or
> devices.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
> ---
> This is a follow-up to the patch titled "irqchip: gic: Add a cpu map for
> each GIC instance" and discussed here [1]. Based upon the discussion I have
> re-worked and re-titled it approriately.
>
> [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2044421.html
>
> drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
> index a530d9a9b810..7566fe259d27 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
> @@ -416,19 +416,26 @@ static void gic_cpu_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic)
> int i;
>
> /*
> - * Get what the GIC says our CPU mask is.
> + * Setting up the CPU map is only relevant for the primary GIC
> + * because any nested/secondary GICs do not directly interface
> + * with the CPU(s).
> */
> - BUG_ON(cpu >= NR_GIC_CPU_IF);
> - cpu_mask = gic_get_cpumask(gic);
> - gic_cpu_map[cpu] = cpu_mask;
> + if (gic == &gic_data[0]) {
> + /*
> + * Get what the GIC says our CPU mask is.
> + */
> + BUG_ON(cpu >= NR_GIC_CPU_IF);
> + cpu_mask = gic_get_cpumask(gic);
> + gic_cpu_map[cpu] = cpu_mask;
>
> - /*
> - * Clear our mask from the other map entries in case they're
> - * still undefined.
> - */
> - for (i = 0; i < NR_GIC_CPU_IF; i++)
> - if (i != cpu)
> - gic_cpu_map[i] &= ~cpu_mask;
> + /*
> + * Clear our mask from the other map entries in case they're
> + * still undefined.
> + */
> + for (i = 0; i < NR_GIC_CPU_IF; i++)
> + if (i != cpu)
> + gic_cpu_map[i] &= ~cpu_mask;
> + }
>
> gic_cpu_config(dist_base, NULL);
>
> @@ -977,13 +984,6 @@ void __init gic_init_bases(unsigned int gic_nr, int irq_start,
> }
>
> /*
> - * Initialize the CPU interface map to all CPUs.
> - * It will be refined as each CPU probes its ID.
> - */
> - for (i = 0; i < NR_GIC_CPU_IF; i++)
> - gic_cpu_map[i] = 0xff;
> -
> - /*
> * Find out how many interrupts are supported.
> * The GIC only supports up to 1020 interrupt sources.
> */
> @@ -1028,6 +1028,13 @@ void __init gic_init_bases(unsigned int gic_nr, int irq_start,
> return;
>
> if (gic_nr == 0) {
> + /*
> + * Initialize the CPU interface map to all CPUs.
> + * It will be refined as each CPU probes its ID.
> + * This is only necessary for the primary GIC.
> + */
> + for (i = 0; i < NR_GIC_CPU_IF; i++)
> + gic_cpu_map[i] = 0xff;
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> set_smp_cross_call(gic_raise_softirq);
> register_cpu_notifier(&gic_cpu_notifier);
>
Looks good.
I think there is a another bug caused by 322895062 ("irqchip: gic:
Preserve gic V2 bypass bits in cpu ctrl register"), where
gic_cpu_if_up() only acts on the primary GIC. In the secondary GIC case,
it will stay disabled.
Mind fixing this while you're at it?
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists