[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55BA415D.4080706@maciej.szmigiero.name>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 17:23:09 +0200
From: "Maciej S. Szmigiero" <mail@...iej.szmigiero.name>
To: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
CC: "alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
Timur Tabi <timur@...i.org>,
Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>,
Xiubo Li <Xiubo.Lee@...il.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] ASoC: fsl_ssi: enable IPG clock during AC'97 reg
access
Hi Fabio,
On 30.07.2015 17:20, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Hi Maciej,
>
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Maciej S. Szmigiero
> <mail@...iej.szmigiero.name> wrote:
>
>> static unsigned short fsl_ssi_ac97_read(struct snd_ac97 *ac97,
>> @@ -1151,6 +1160,14 @@ static unsigned short fsl_ssi_ac97_read(struct snd_ac97 *ac97,
>> unsigned short val = -1;
>> u32 reg_val;
>> unsigned int lreg;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = clk_prepare_enable(fsl_ac97_data->clk);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + pr_err("ac97 read clk_prepare_enable failed: %d\n",
>> + ret);
>> + return -1;
>
> return ret, please.
>
This function normal return value is an AC'97 register value,
so isn't more appropriate to return 0xffff in case of error
than linux error code?
Best regards,
Maciej Szmigiero
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists