[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150730164523.GA5364@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 09:45:23 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@...e.cz>
Cc: David Drysdale <drysdale@...gle.com>, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Eric B Munson <emunson@...mai.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>,
David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>,
Milosz Tanski <milosz@...in.com>, Fam Zheng <famz@...hat.com>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 1/1] Documentation: describe how to add a system call
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 06:30:07PM +0200, Cyril Hrubis wrote:
> Hi!
> > +Testing
> > +-------
> > +
> > +A new system call should obviously be tested; it is also useful to provide
> > +reviewers with a demonstration of how user space programs will use the system
> > +call. A good way to combine these aims is to include a simple self-test
> > +program in a new directory under tools/testing/selftests/.
>
> I know that this is a bit off topic, but since the selftest is now the
> official place to add kernel testcases to let me rant about it a bit.
>
> It's a bit of a pain seeing people reinvent the wheel and trying to
> figure out consistent test interface while most of the problems has been
> solved in LTP[1] test library quite some time ago. Especially use of the
> SAFE_MACROS[2] would simplify writing test setups quite a lot.
>
> I wonder if we can at least share the test library, pulling it out of
> LTP, or at least the interesting parts, wouldn't be hard at all.
>
> [1]
> https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/wiki/Test-Writing-Guidelines#221-basic-test-structure
>
> [2]
> https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/wiki/Test-Writing-Guidelines#224-safe-macros
That would be great, please send patches to do so to the linux-api
mailing list and the test maintainer.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists