[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55BA5B48.1050005@osg.samsung.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 19:13:44 +0200
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>,
lm-sensors@...sensors.org, Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, rtc-linux@...glegroups.com,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@....samsung.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Sjoerd Simons <sjoerd.simons@...labora.co.uk>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Bryan Wu <cooloney@...il.com>, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@....fi>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/27] Export I2C and OF module aliases in missing drivers
Hello Dmitry,
Thanks a lot for your feedback.
On 07/30/2015 06:37 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 09:35:17AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>> Hi Javier,
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 06:18:25PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Short version:
>>>
>>> This series add the missing MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE() for OF and I2C tables
>>> to export that information so modules have the correct aliases built-in
>>> and autoloading works correctly.
>>>
>>> Longer version:
>>>
>>> Currently it's mandatory for I2C drivers to have an I2C device ID table
>>> regardless if the device was registered using platform data or OF. This
>>> is because the I2C core needs an I2C device ID table for two reasons:
>>>
>>> 1) Match the I2C client with a I2C device ID so a struct i2c_device_id
>>> is passed to the I2C driver probe() function.
>>>
>>> 2) Export the module aliases from the I2C device ID table so userspace
>>> can auto-load the correct module. This is because i2c_device_uevent
>>> always reports a MODALIAS of the form i2c:<client->name>.
>>
>> Why are we not fixing this? We emit specially carved uevent for
>> ACPI-based devices, why not the same for OF? Platform bus does this...
>
> Ah, now I see the 27/27 patch. I think it is exactly what we need. And
Yes, patch 27/27 is needed but the problem is as I explained before that
there are drivers relying on the current behavior. The item c) in the list
of issues that I mentioned. So those drivers need to be fixed before that
patch is merged...
> probably for SPI bus as well.
>
Yes, I didn't mention SPI because the cover letter became too long
already but it does indeed have the same issue and I discussed this
with Mark already some time ago [0].
Once I2C uevent report is fixed, I plan to do the same for SPI.
> Thanks.
>
[0]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/11/458
Best regards,
--
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists