[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150730173416.GP25159@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 19:34:16 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] stop_machine: cleanups, fix, remove lglock
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 09:22:19PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Let me resend this. The only change in v2 is that I rediffed this
> series against v4.2-rc3.
>
> 5/6 patch fixes the bug, I think. Say, stop_one_cpu(X) can race with
> _cpu_down(X)->stop_machine() so that the kernel will crash if this
> CPU X becomes online again. The window after cpu_stopper_thread()
> returns and before smpboot_thread() calls ->park() is tiny, but still
> this is possible afaics. But see the changelog in 6/6, I think we
> should turn this cpu_stop_signal_done() into BUG() later.
These I've queued (from v1 I think, nothing really changed there).
> 6/6 removes lglock from kernel/stop_machine.c.
>
> Peter, Rik, what do you think ?
This one I've got some 'problems' with, but let me reply there.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists