[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150730173643.GH3159@codeaurora.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 10:36:43 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: James Liao <jamesjj.liao@...iatek.com>
Cc: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
srv_heupstream@...iatek.com, Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@...omium.org>,
Ricky Liang <jcliang@...omium.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 01/10] clk: mediatek: Removed unused dpi_ck clock from
MT8173
On 07/29, James Liao wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> Could you help to apply this patch into 4.2?
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> James
>
> On Wed, 2015-07-29 at 09:05 +0200, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, 29. Juli 2015, 14:52:25 schrieb James Liao:
> > > The dpi_ck clock can be removed because it not actually used
> > > in topckgen and subsystems.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: James Liao <jamesjj.liao@...iatek.com>
> >
> > From our past discussions this change looks about right, and should still
> > become _part of 4.2_, to not have the CLK_TOP_DPI become part of the
> > devicetree CLK_TOP_DPI.
Did you mean ABI?
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
> >
Is it being used in DT right now and causing regressions on
v4.2-rcX? Sorry, I'm trying to understand why this patch matters
for the 4.2 release.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists