linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the at91 tree with the arm-soc tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 31 Jul 2015 08:38:03 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the at91 tree with the arm-soc tree

Hi Nicolas,

Today's linux-next merge of the at91 tree got a conflict in:

  arch/arm/mach-at91/sama5.c

between commit:

  19c233b79d1a ("ARM: appropriate __init annotation for const data")

from the arm-soc tree and commit:

  a6e41317b9b8 ("ARM: at91/soc: add basic support for new sama5d2 SoC")

from the at91 tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au

diff --cc arch/arm/mach-at91/sama5.c
index 8fc47630bbc8,90c3c3051ae7..000000000000
--- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/sama5.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/sama5.c
@@@ -63,7 -65,8 +65,8 @@@ DT_MACHINE_START(sama5_dt, "Atmel SAMA5
  	.dt_compat	= sama5_dt_board_compat,
  MACHINE_END
  
 -static const char *sama5_alt_dt_board_compat[] __initconst = {
 +static const char *const sama5_alt_dt_board_compat[] __initconst = {
+ 	"atmel,sama5d2",
  	"atmel,sama5d4",
  	NULL
  };
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/