[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20150731194010.630531412@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 12:41:24 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.1 233/267] of/address: use atomic allocation in pci_register_io_range()
4.1-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>
commit 294240ffe784e951dc2ef070da04fa31ef6db3a0 upstream.
When kzalloc() is called under spin_lock(), GFP_ATOMIC should be
used to avoid sleeping allocation.
The call tree is:
of_pci_range_to_resource()
--> pci_register_io_range() <-- takes spin_lock(&io_range_lock);
--> kzalloc()
Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/of/address.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/of/address.c
+++ b/drivers/of/address.c
@@ -712,7 +712,7 @@ int __weak pci_register_io_range(phys_ad
}
/* add the range to the list */
- range = kzalloc(sizeof(*range), GFP_KERNEL);
+ range = kzalloc(sizeof(*range), GFP_ATOMIC);
if (!range) {
err = -ENOMEM;
goto end_register;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists