[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJKOXPfwnYVyJCPPyG5L0B2kw9nG1KNgj7L6Sy2hJEbihf-b2Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 17:04:58 +0900
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
To: Robert Baldyga <r.baldyga@...sung.com>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
jslaby@...e.cz, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] serial: samsung: fix DMA for small FIFO sizes
2015-07-30 18:14 GMT+09:00 Robert Baldyga <r.baldyga@...sung.com>:
> Hello,
>
> This patch set fixes bug causing serial hang in DMA mode for FIFO sizes
> smaller than cache alignment. The first patch fixes DMA mode entering
> condition to avoid starting with buffer smaller than cache line size.
> Second patch fixes the serial hang bug, which was caused by unproper
> buffer aligning algorithm which assumed that there is always enough
> free space in FIFO for excessive bytes of buffer that is being alligned.
>
> Best regards,
> Robert Baldyga
>
> Marek Szyprowski (1):
> serial: samsung: calculate min_dma_size
>
> Robert Baldyga (1):
> serial: samsung: fix DMA for FIFO smaller than cache line size
>
> drivers/tty/serial/samsung.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> drivers/tty/serial/samsung.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
Does this apply for stable backporting? Or at least fixes tag
indicating a bug? I could not figure this out from description of
first patch. For second patch it seems it applies.
Anyway I would appreciate a reported-by credits.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists