[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150731081031.GA13438@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 10:10:31 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] perf: hw_breakpoint safety improvements
* Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org> wrote:
> Hi, Peter-
>
> Here are some baby steps toward eliminating nested NMIs. What do
> you think?
>
> Andy Lutomirski (3):
> x86/perf/hw_breakpoint: Disallow kernel breakpoints unless kprobe-safe
> x86/perf/hw_breakpoint: Improve range breakpoint validation
> x86/perf/hw_breakpoint: Fix check for kernelspace breakpoints
>
> arch/x86/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> include/linux/kprobes.h | 2 ++
> kernel/kprobes.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Looks good to me at first glance. Cc:-ed Frederic who wrote and maintains these
bits. Frederic, what do you think?
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists