[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55BACDD9.6020505@windriver.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 09:22:33 +0800
From: fupan <fupan.li@...driver.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <fupanli@...il.com>,
<linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>,
<stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.10 ~ 3.14] efi: fix the efi 32bit boot failed problem
On 07/31/2015 12:59 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 05:45:44PM +0100, Matt Fleming wrote:
>> On Thu, 30 Jul, at 09:31:02AM, Greg KH wrote:
>>> Why isn't this an issue in newer kernel releases? Did this already get
>>> fixed by some other patch? If so, why can't we just take that patch?
>>> If not, why not?
>>
>> The commit 35d5134b7d5a ("x86/efi: Correct EFI boot stub use of
>> code32_start") only exists in the stable trees in that form because
>> there was quite a lot of churn in that area in Linus tree that didn't
>> get backported.
>>
>> So the code in Linus' tree never looked like the code in the stable does
>> right now.
>>
>>> I _REALLY_ don't like taking patches that are not already in Linus's
>>> tree, as it almost always turns out to be the wrong solution.
>> Yeah, I think this issue verifies that.
> Ugh, what a mess. Ok, if you get something that works and is in a
> format that I can apply it, please resend it properly so that we can do
> so.
Hi, Matt
Will you take care of this patch or I send a V2?
Thanks!
Fupan
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists