[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150731102009.GH27985@piout.net>
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 12:20:09 +0200
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
rtc-linux@...glegroups.com, Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/23] ARM: at91: Properly handle slow clock
Hi,
On 31/07/2015 at 11:59:03 +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote :
> I would have squashed commit 5 to 14 into a single patch, but apart
> from that it looks good to me.
>
I wanted to clearly list were the slow clock was needed for each soc. It
actually allowed me to find one that was missing.
--
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists