lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1438343231-20240-1-git-send-email-alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Date:	Fri, 31 Jul 2015 14:47:11 +0300
From:	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	adrian.hunter@...el.com, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
	acme@...radead.org,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] perf/x86/intel/pt: Do not force sync packets on every schedule-in

Currently, the PT driver zeroes out the status register every time before
starting the event. However, all the writable bits are already taken care
of in pt_handle_status() function, except the new PacketByteCnt field,
which in new versions of PT contains the number of packet bytes written
since the last sync (PSB) packet. Zeroing it out before enabling PT forces
a sync packet to be written. This means that, with the existing code, a
sync packet (PSB and PSBEND, 18 bytes in total) will be generated every
time a PT event is scheduled in.

To avoid these unnecessary syncs and save a WRMSR in the fast path, this
patch changes the default behavior to not clear PacketByteCnt field, so
that the sync packets will be generated with the period specified as
"psb_period" attribute config field. This has little impact on the trace
data as the other packets that are normally sent within PSB+ (between PSB
and PSBEND) have their own generation scenarios which do not depend on the
sync packets.

One exception where we do need to force PSB like this when tracing starts,
so that the decoder has a clear sync point in the trace. For this purpose
we aready have hw::itrace_started flag, which we are currently using to
output PERF_RECORD_ITRACE_START. This patch moves setting itrace_started
from perf core to the pmu::start, where it should still be 0 on the very
first run.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_pt.c | 7 +++++--
 kernel/events/core.c                      | 2 --
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_pt.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_pt.c
index 695fd6c562..e20cfacb5a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_pt.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_pt.c
@@ -257,6 +257,11 @@ static void pt_config(struct perf_event *event)
 {
 	u64 reg;
 
+	if (!event->hw.itrace_started) {
+		event->hw.itrace_started = 1;
+		wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_RTIT_STATUS, 0);
+	}
+
 	reg = RTIT_CTL_TOPA | RTIT_CTL_BRANCH_EN | RTIT_CTL_TRACEEN;
 
 	if (!event->attr.exclude_kernel)
@@ -976,7 +981,6 @@ void intel_pt_interrupt(void)
 
 		pt_config_buffer(buf->cur->table, buf->cur_idx,
 				 buf->output_off);
-		wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_RTIT_STATUS, 0);
 		pt_config(event);
 	}
 }
@@ -1000,7 +1004,6 @@ static void pt_event_start(struct perf_event *event, int mode)
 
 	pt_config_buffer(buf->cur->table, buf->cur_idx,
 			 buf->output_off);
-	wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_RTIT_STATUS, 0);
 	pt_config(event);
 }
 
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index d3dae3419b..15da13237a 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -6040,8 +6040,6 @@ static void perf_log_itrace_start(struct perf_event *event)
 	    event->hw.itrace_started)
 		return;
 
-	event->hw.itrace_started = 1;
-
 	rec.header.type	= PERF_RECORD_ITRACE_START;
 	rec.header.misc	= 0;
 	rec.header.size	= sizeof(rec);
-- 
2.4.6

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ