linux-kernel - [tip:x86/asm] selftests/x86/vm86: Fix entry_from

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <tip-e800eb39e3f586e46a2007f72d3b609f6e3b888d@git.kernel.org>
Date:	Fri, 31 Jul 2015 07:02:45 -0700
From:	tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski <tipbot@...or.com>
To:	linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, peterz@...radead.org, bp@...en8.de,
	luto@...nel.org, dvlasenk@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
	mingo@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com, brgerst@...il.com,
	luto@...capital.net, shuahkh@....samsung.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [tip:x86/asm] selftests/x86/vm86:
  Fix entry_from_vm86 test on 64-bit kernels

Commit-ID:  e800eb39e3f586e46a2007f72d3b609f6e3b888d
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/e800eb39e3f586e46a2007f72d3b609f6e3b888d
Author:     Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
AuthorDate: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 14:35:43 -0700
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 13:31:07 +0200

selftests/x86/vm86: Fix entry_from_vm86 test on 64-bit kernels

The test failed due to an oversight on my part when run on a
64-bit kernel.  vm86 isn't expected to work at all, and I
mistakenly failed one part of the test because no signal was
delivered.

Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/502c8bef877b33fe4943885ded6125dfcc7892db.1438205722.git.luto@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/x86/entry_from_vm86.c | 11 +++++++----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/entry_from_vm86.c b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/entry_from_vm86.c
index f004b2a..9a43a59 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/entry_from_vm86.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/entry_from_vm86.c
@@ -105,7 +105,8 @@ extern unsigned char vmcode[], end_vmcode[];
 extern unsigned char vmcode_bound[], vmcode_sysenter[], vmcode_syscall[],
 	vmcode_sti[], vmcode_int3[], vmcode_int80[];
 
-static void do_test(struct vm86plus_struct *v86, unsigned long eip,
+/* Returns false if the test was skipped. */
+static bool do_test(struct vm86plus_struct *v86, unsigned long eip,
 		    unsigned int rettype, unsigned int retarg,
 		    const char *text)
 {
@@ -117,7 +118,7 @@ static void do_test(struct vm86plus_struct *v86, unsigned long eip,
 
 	if (ret == -1 && errno == ENOSYS) {
 		printf("[SKIP]\tvm86 not supported\n");
-		return;
+		return false;
 	}
 
 	if (VM86_TYPE(ret) == VM86_INTx) {
@@ -154,6 +155,8 @@ static void do_test(struct vm86plus_struct *v86, unsigned long eip,
 		printf("[FAIL]\tIncorrect return reason\n");
 		nerrs++;
 	}
+
+	return true;
 }
 
 int main(void)
@@ -219,8 +222,8 @@ int main(void)
 	v86.regs.ss = 0;
 	sethandler(SIGSEGV, sighandler, 0);
 	got_signal = 0;
-	do_test(&v86, 0, VM86_SIGNAL, 0, "Execute null pointer");
-	if (!got_signal) {
+	if (do_test(&v86, 0, VM86_SIGNAL, 0, "Execute null pointer") &&
+	    !got_signal) {
 		printf("[FAIL]\tDid not receive SIGSEGV\n");
 		nerrs++;
 	}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/