linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drivers/usb/: Simplify return statements

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150731050558.GA2481@alcatraz>
Date:	Fri, 31 Jul 2015 05:06:07 +0000
From:	"Karajgaonkar, Saurabh (S.)" <skarajga@...teon.com>
To:	Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
CC:	"srinivas.kandagatla@...il.com" <srinivas.kandagatla@...il.com>,
	"maxime.coquelin@...com" <maxime.coquelin@...com>,
	"patrice.chotard@...com" <patrice.chotard@...com>,
	"stern@...land.harvard.edu" <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
	"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	"mathias.nyman@...el.com" <mathias.nyman@...el.com>,
	"johan@...nel.org" <johan@...nel.org>,
	"sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com" 
	<sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
	"Julia.Lawall@...6.fr" <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>,
	"khilman@...aro.org" <khilman@...aro.org>,
	"rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
	"pmladek@...e.cz" <pmladek@...e.cz>,
	"wsa@...-dreams.de" <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"kernel@...inux.com" <kernel@...inux.com>,
	"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/usb/: Simplify return statements

Sure, I'll do that. Just wanted to know whether I should split the patches and
send them in this same mail thread (may be something like [PATCH 01/04 V2])
or should I start new threads and send them separately to the respective maintainers.

Thanks and Regards,
Saurabh Karajgaonkar

On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 11:25:27AM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 01:13:42PM +0000, Karajgaonkar, Saurabh (S.) wrote:
> > From: Saurabh Karajgaonkar <skarajga@...teon.com>
> > 
> > This patch is created using simple_return.cocci coccinelle script.
> > It replaces the redundant instances where variables are assigned
> > return value from functions and then used in return statements.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Saurabh Karajgaonkar <skarajga@...teon.com>
> 
> do you mind splitting this per-driver ? That makes it a lot easier for
> different maintainers to take their part. For example, I would take
> drivers/usb/phy/* and drivers/usb/musb/*
> 
> Alan Stern would handle drivers/usb/host/[uoe]hci*.[ch]
> 
> Mathias Nyman, driver/usb/host/xhci*.[ch]
> 
> and so on. Thanks
> 
> -- 
> balbi

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/