[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150731060711.GK3159@codeaurora.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 23:07:11 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>, linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, rob.herring@...aro.org,
arnd.bergmann@...aro.org, nm@...com, broonie@...nel.org,
mturquette@...libre.com, Sudeep.Holla@....com,
viswanath.puttagunta@...aro.org, l.stach@...gutronix.de,
thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, ta.omasab@...il.com,
kesavan.abhilash@...il.com, khilman@...aro.org,
santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com, b.zolnierkie@...sung.com,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 11/16] PM / OPP: Add helpers for initializing CPU OPPs
On 07/29, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> With "operating-points-v2" its possible to tell which devices share
> OPPs. We already have infrastructure to decode that information.
>
> This patch adds following APIs:
> - of_get_cpus_sharing_opps: Returns cpumask of CPUs sharing OPPs (only
> valid with v2 bindings).
> - of_cpumask_init_opp_table: Initializes OPPs for all CPUs present in
> cpumask.
> - of_cpumask_free_opp_table: Frees OPPs for all CPUs present in cpumask.
>
> - set_cpus_sharing_opps: Sets which CPUs share OPPs (only valid with old
> OPP bindings, as this information isn't present in DT).
>
> Reviewed-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Some minor nitpicks below:
> +
> +/*
> + * Works only for OPP v2 bindings.
> + *
> + * cpumask should be already set to mask of cpu_dev->id.
> + * Returns -ENOENT if operating-points-v2 bindings aren't supported.
> + */
> +int of_get_cpus_sharing_opps(struct device *cpu_dev, cpumask_var_t cpumask)
> +{
> + struct device_node *np, *tmp_np;
> + struct device *tcpu_dev;
> + int cpu, ret = 0;
> +
> + /* Get OPP descriptor node */
> + np = _of_get_opp_desc_node(cpu_dev);
> + if (IS_ERR(np)) {
> + dev_dbg(cpu_dev, "%s: Couldn't find opp node: %ld\n", __func__,
> + PTR_ERR(np));
> + return -ENOENT;
> + }
> +
> + /* OPPs are shared ? */
> + if (!of_get_property(np, "opp-shared", NULL))
if (!of_property_read_bool(np, "opp-shared")) ?
> + goto put_cpu_node;
> +
> + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> + if (cpu == cpu_dev->id)
> + continue;
> +
> + tcpu_dev = get_cpu_device(cpu);
> + if (!tcpu_dev) {
> + dev_err(cpu_dev, "%s: failed to get cpu%d device\n",
> + __func__, cpu);
> + ret = -ENODEV;
> + goto put_cpu_node;
> + }
> +
> + /* Get OPP descriptor node */
> + tmp_np = _of_get_opp_desc_node(tcpu_dev);
> + if (IS_ERR(tmp_np)) {
> + dev_info(tcpu_dev, "%s: Couldn't find opp node: %ld\n",
dev_err?
> + __func__, PTR_ERR(tmp_np));
> + ret = -EINVAL;
Why aren't we returning the PTR_ERR value here?
> + goto put_cpu_node;
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists