linux-kernel - [PATCH V4 (was V6)] generalize audit_del

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat,  1 Aug 2015 15:44:00 -0400
From:	Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>
To:	linux-audit@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>, sgrubb@...hat.com,
	pmoore@...hat.com, eparis@...hat.com
Subject: [PATCH V4 (was V6)] generalize audit_del_rule

This patch was split out from the audit by executable path patch set due to the
potential to use it elsewhere.

In particular, some questions came up while assessing the potential for code
reuse:

	Why does audit_remove_parent_watches() not call audit_del_rule() for
	each entry found?
                Is audit_signals not properly decremented?
                Is audit_n_rules not properly decremented?

        Why does kill_rules() not call audit_del_rule() for each entry found?
                Is audit_signals not properly decremented?
                Is audit_n_rules not properly decremented?


Richard Guy Briggs (1):
  audit: save signal match info in case entry passed in is the one
    deleted

 kernel/auditfilter.c |    3 ++-
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/