linux-kernel - [PATCH 02/28] kexec: define kexec_in_progress in !CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat,  1 Aug 2015 16:08:06 -0700
From:	"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>
To:	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	devel@...uxdriverproject.org, olaf@...fle.de, apw@...onical.com,
	vkuznets@...hat.com, jasowang@...hat.com
Cc:	"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH 02/28] kexec: define kexec_in_progress in !CONFIG_KEXEC case

From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>

If some piece of code wants to check kexec_in_progress it has to be put
in #ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC block to not break the build in !CONFIG_KEXEC
case. Overcome this limitation by defining kexec_in_progress to false.

Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>
---
 include/linux/kexec.h |    1 +
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/kexec.h b/include/linux/kexec.h
index e804306..b63218f 100644
--- a/include/linux/kexec.h
+++ b/include/linux/kexec.h
@@ -323,6 +323,7 @@ struct pt_regs;
 struct task_struct;
 static inline void crash_kexec(struct pt_regs *regs) { }
 static inline int kexec_should_crash(struct task_struct *p) { return 0; }
+#define kexec_in_progress false
 #endif /* CONFIG_KEXEC */
 
 #endif /* !defined(__ASSEBMLY__) */
-- 
1.7.4.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/