linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.2 032/164] ALSA: emu10k1: don't deadlock in proc-functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <lsq.1438473757.755703201@decadent.org.uk>
Date:	Sun, 02 Aug 2015 01:02:37 +0100
From:	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, "Michael Gernoth" <michael@...noth.net>,
	"Takashi Iwai" <tiwai@...e.de>
Subject: [PATCH 3.2 032/164] ALSA: emu10k1: don't deadlock in proc-functions

3.2.70-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Michael Gernoth <michael@...noth.net>

commit 91bf0c2dcb935a87e5c0795f5047456b965fd143 upstream.

The functions snd_emu10k1_proc_spdif_read and snd_emu1010_fpga_read
acquire the emu_lock before accessing the FPGA. The function used
to access the FPGA (snd_emu1010_fpga_read) also tries to take
the emu_lock which causes a deadlock.
Remove the outer locking in the proc-functions (guarding only the
already safe fpga read) to prevent this deadlock.

[removed superfluous flags variables too -- tiwai]

Signed-off-by: Michael Gernoth <michael@...noth.net>
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
 sound/pci/emu10k1/emuproc.c | 12 ------------
 1 file changed, 12 deletions(-)

--- a/sound/pci/emu10k1/emuproc.c
+++ b/sound/pci/emu10k1/emuproc.c
@@ -241,31 +241,22 @@ static void snd_emu10k1_proc_spdif_read(
 	struct snd_emu10k1 *emu = entry->private_data;
 	u32 value;
 	u32 value2;
-	unsigned long flags;
 	u32 rate;
 
 	if (emu->card_capabilities->emu_model) {
-		spin_lock_irqsave(&emu->emu_lock, flags);
 		snd_emu1010_fpga_read(emu, 0x38, &value);
-		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&emu->emu_lock, flags);
 		if ((value & 0x1) == 0) {
-			spin_lock_irqsave(&emu->emu_lock, flags);
 			snd_emu1010_fpga_read(emu, 0x2a, &value);
 			snd_emu1010_fpga_read(emu, 0x2b, &value2);
-			spin_unlock_irqrestore(&emu->emu_lock, flags);
 			rate = 0x1770000 / (((value << 5) | value2)+1);	
 			snd_iprintf(buffer, "ADAT Locked : %u\n", rate);
 		} else {
 			snd_iprintf(buffer, "ADAT Unlocked\n");
 		}
-		spin_lock_irqsave(&emu->emu_lock, flags);
 		snd_emu1010_fpga_read(emu, 0x20, &value);
-		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&emu->emu_lock, flags);
 		if ((value & 0x4) == 0) {
-			spin_lock_irqsave(&emu->emu_lock, flags);
 			snd_emu1010_fpga_read(emu, 0x28, &value);
 			snd_emu1010_fpga_read(emu, 0x29, &value2);
-			spin_unlock_irqrestore(&emu->emu_lock, flags);
 			rate = 0x1770000 / (((value << 5) | value2)+1);	
 			snd_iprintf(buffer, "SPDIF Locked : %d\n", rate);
 		} else {
@@ -410,14 +401,11 @@ static void snd_emu_proc_emu1010_reg_rea
 {
 	struct snd_emu10k1 *emu = entry->private_data;
 	u32 value;
-	unsigned long flags;
 	int i;
 	snd_iprintf(buffer, "EMU1010 Registers:\n\n");
 
 	for(i = 0; i < 0x40; i+=1) {
-		spin_lock_irqsave(&emu->emu_lock, flags);
 		snd_emu1010_fpga_read(emu, i, &value);
-		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&emu->emu_lock, flags);
 		snd_iprintf(buffer, "%02X: %08X, %02X\n", i, value, (value >> 8) & 0x7f);
 	}
 }

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/