[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <lsq.1438473757.780586643@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2015 01:02:37 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, "Wang Long" <long.wanglong@...wei.com>,
"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3.2 123/164] ring-buffer-benchmark: Fix the wrong
sched_priority of producer
3.2.70-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Wang Long <long.wanglong@...wei.com>
commit 108029323910c5dd1ef8fa2d10da1ce5fbce6e12 upstream.
The producer should be used producer_fifo as its sched_priority,
so correct it.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1433923957-67842-1-git-send-email-long.wanglong@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Wang Long <long.wanglong@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c
@@ -455,7 +455,7 @@ static int __init ring_buffer_benchmark_
if (producer_fifo >= 0) {
struct sched_param param = {
- .sched_priority = consumer_fifo
+ .sched_priority = producer_fifo
};
sched_setscheduler(producer, SCHED_FIFO, ¶m);
} else
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists