[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150802074220.GF3720@amd>
Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2015 09:42:20 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Dr. Werner Fink" <werner@...e.de>
Subject: Re: May close() return any error code?
On Wed 2015-07-29 12:46:59, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> Hi,
>
> while debugging a problem of X and gdm with the old systemd-210, we
> encountered a sudden death of systemd-logind, and this turned out to
> be an unexpected errno from close(). The close() call for input
> devices returns ENODEV error. The logind in systemd-210 treats this
> error code as fatal, triggers assert() and eventually kills itself.
> The details are found in an openSUSE bugzilla thread:
> https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=939571
>
> This seems coming from evdev_flush(). As there is no fd leak, it's no
> big problem per se. But, now the question is whether returning such
> an error code is correct behavior at all. At least, it doesn't seem
> defined in POSIX:
>
http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/close.html
Returning an error from close() would imply that file descriptor is
not closed.... seems like bad idea. Just fix the kernel not to do it.
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists