linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86, acpi: Handle lapic/x2apic entries in MADT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1508021154170.3825@nanos>
Date:	Sun, 2 Aug 2015 11:57:04 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Lukasz Anaczkowski <lukasz.anaczkowski@...el.com>
cc:	mingo@...hat.com, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
	Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>, rjw@...ysocki.net,
	len.brown@...el.com, pavel@....cz, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, acpi: Handle lapic/x2apic entries in MADT

On Thu, 30 Jul 2015, Lukasz Anaczkowski wrote:
> Also, order in which MADT LAPIC/X2APIC handlers are passed is
> reversed to achieve correct CPU enumeration.

Ok. That is an understandable changelog and the patch itself looks
about correct, but I leave that judgement to the ACPI experts.

This also wants an ack/review from Marc for the GIC part.

Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/