linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v4] powerpc/mpc85xx: Add MDIO bus muxing support to the board device tree(s)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <DM2PR03MB509FD00DD1CB7AB0449B5ADE6880@DM2PR03MB509.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Date:	Sun, 2 Aug 2015 11:42:25 +0000
From:	Liberman Igal <Igal.Liberman@...escale.com>
To:	Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>
CC:	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
	Madalin-Cristian Bucur <madalin.bucur@...escale.com>,
	Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@...escale.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4] powerpc/mpc85xx: Add MDIO bus muxing support to the
 board device tree(s)



Regards,
Igal Liberman.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wood Scott-B07421
> Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2015 11:16 PM
> To: Liberman Igal-B31950
> Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org; linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org; Bucur
> Madalin-Cristian-B32716; Xie Shaohui-B21989; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] powerpc/mpc85xx: Add MDIO bus muxing support
> to the board device tree(s)
> 
> On Thu, 2015-07-30 at 07:47 +0300, Igal.Liberman wrote:
> > From: Igal Liberman <Igal.Liberman@...escale.com>
> >
> > Describe the PHY topology for all configurations supported by each
> > board
> >
> > Based on prior work by Andy Fleming <afleming@...escale.com>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Igal Liberman <Igal.Liberman@...escale.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Shruti Kanetkar <Shruti@...escale.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Emil Medve <Emilian.Medve@...escale.com>
> 
> Signoffs should be in chronological order.  You were the last to touch/submit
> this, so yours should go last.  Likewise in the other patches you just posted.
> 

Ok, I'll keep the correct order, thanks for pointing out. 

> -Scott