lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list] 
Message-ID: <lsq.1438473758.995700683@decadent.org.uk>
Date:	Sun, 02 Aug 2015 01:02:38 +0100
From:	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, "Josh Boyer" <jwboyer@...hat.com>,
	"Mauro Carvalho Chehab" <mchehab@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.2 145/164] Fix sb_edac compilation with 32 bits kernels

3.2.70-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>

commit 5b889e379f340f43b1252abde5d37a7084c846b9 upstream.

As reported by Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...hat.com>:
>	drivers/edac/sb_edac.c: In function 'get_memory_error_data':
> 	drivers/edac/sb_edac.c:861:2: warning: left shift count >= width of type
> 	[enabled by default]
> 	<snip>
> 	ERROR: "__udivdi3" [drivers/edac/sb_edac.ko] undefined!
> 	make[1]: *** [__modpost] Error 1
> 	make: *** [modules] Error 2

PS.: compile-tested only

Reported-by: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>
[bwh: Prerequisite for "sb_edac: Fix erroneous bytes->gigabytes conversion"]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
 drivers/edac/Kconfig   |  2 +-
 drivers/edac/sb_edac.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/edac/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/edac/Kconfig
@@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ config EDAC_I7300
 
 config EDAC_SBRIDGE
 	tristate "Intel Sandy-Bridge Integrated MC"
-	depends on EDAC_MM_EDAC && PCI && X86_64 && X86_MCE_INTEL
+	depends on EDAC_MM_EDAC && PCI && X86 && X86_MCE_INTEL
 	depends on EXPERIMENTAL
 	help
 	  Support for error detection and correction the Intel
--- a/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
 #include <linux/mmzone.h>
 #include <linux/smp.h>
 #include <linux/bitmap.h>
+#include <linux/math64.h>
 #include <asm/processor.h>
 #include <asm/mce.h>
 
@@ -671,6 +672,7 @@ static void get_memory_layout(const stru
 	u32 reg;
 	u64 limit, prv = 0;
 	u64 tmp_mb;
+	u32 mb, kb;
 	u32 rir_way;
 
 	/*
@@ -683,8 +685,9 @@ static void get_memory_layout(const stru
 	pvt->tolm = GET_TOLM(reg);
 	tmp_mb = (1 + pvt->tolm) >> 20;
 
-	debugf0("TOLM: %Lu.%03Lu GB (0x%016Lx)\n",
-		tmp_mb / 1000, tmp_mb % 1000, (u64)pvt->tolm);
+	mb = div_u64_rem(tmp_mb, 1000, &kb);
+	debugf0("TOLM: %u.%03u GB (0x%016Lx)\n",
+		mb, kb, (u64)pvt->tolm);
 
 	/* Address range is already 45:25 */
 	pci_read_config_dword(pvt->pci_sad1, TOHM,
@@ -692,8 +695,9 @@ static void get_memory_layout(const stru
 	pvt->tohm = GET_TOHM(reg);
 	tmp_mb = (1 + pvt->tohm) >> 20;
 
-	debugf0("TOHM: %Lu.%03Lu GB (0x%016Lx)",
-		tmp_mb / 1000, tmp_mb % 1000, (u64)pvt->tohm);
+	mb = div_u64_rem(tmp_mb, 1000, &kb);
+	debugf0("TOHM: %u.%03u GB (0x%016Lx)",
+		mb, kb, (u64)pvt->tohm);
 
 	/*
 	 * Step 2) Get SAD range and SAD Interleave list
@@ -715,10 +719,11 @@ static void get_memory_layout(const stru
 			break;
 
 		tmp_mb = (limit + 1) >> 20;
-		debugf0("SAD#%d %s up to %Lu.%03Lu GB (0x%016Lx) %s reg=0x%08x\n",
+		mb = div_u64_rem(tmp_mb, 1000, &kb);
+		debugf0("SAD#%d %s up to %u.%03u GB (0x%016Lx) %s reg=0x%08x\n",
 			n_sads,
 			get_dram_attr(reg),
-			tmp_mb / 1000, tmp_mb % 1000,
+			mb, kb,
 			((u64)tmp_mb) << 20L,
 			INTERLEAVE_MODE(reg) ? "Interleave: 8:6" : "Interleave: [8:6]XOR[18:16]",
 			reg);
@@ -748,8 +753,9 @@ static void get_memory_layout(const stru
 			break;
 		tmp_mb = (limit + 1) >> 20;
 
-		debugf0("TAD#%d: up to %Lu.%03Lu GB (0x%016Lx), socket interleave %d, memory interleave %d, TGT: %d, %d, %d, %d, reg=0x%08x\n",
-			n_tads, tmp_mb / 1000, tmp_mb % 1000,
+		mb = div_u64_rem(tmp_mb, 1000, &kb);
+		debugf0("TAD#%d: up to %u.%03u GB (0x%016Lx), socket interleave %d, memory interleave %d, TGT: %d, %d, %d, %d, reg=0x%08x\n",
+			n_tads, mb, kb,
 			((u64)tmp_mb) << 20L,
 			(u32)TAD_SOCK(reg),
 			(u32)TAD_CH(reg),
@@ -772,9 +778,10 @@ static void get_memory_layout(const stru
 					      tad_ch_nilv_offset[j],
 					      &reg);
 			tmp_mb = TAD_OFFSET(reg) >> 20;
-			debugf0("TAD CH#%d, offset #%d: %Lu.%03Lu GB (0x%016Lx), reg=0x%08x\n",
+			mb = div_u64_rem(tmp_mb, 1000, &kb);
+			debugf0("TAD CH#%d, offset #%d: %u.%03u GB (0x%016Lx), reg=0x%08x\n",
 				i, j,
-				tmp_mb / 1000, tmp_mb % 1000,
+				mb, kb,
 				((u64)tmp_mb) << 20L,
 				reg);
 		}
@@ -796,9 +803,10 @@ static void get_memory_layout(const stru
 
 			tmp_mb = RIR_LIMIT(reg) >> 20;
 			rir_way = 1 << RIR_WAY(reg);
-			debugf0("CH#%d RIR#%d, limit: %Lu.%03Lu GB (0x%016Lx), way: %d, reg=0x%08x\n",
+			mb = div_u64_rem(tmp_mb, 1000, &kb);
+			debugf0("CH#%d RIR#%d, limit: %u.%03u GB (0x%016Lx), way: %d, reg=0x%08x\n",
 				i, j,
-				tmp_mb / 1000, tmp_mb % 1000,
+				mb, kb,
 				((u64)tmp_mb) << 20L,
 				rir_way,
 				reg);
@@ -809,9 +817,10 @@ static void get_memory_layout(const stru
 						      &reg);
 				tmp_mb = RIR_OFFSET(reg) << 6;
 
-				debugf0("CH#%d RIR#%d INTL#%d, offset %Lu.%03Lu GB (0x%016Lx), tgt: %d, reg=0x%08x\n",
+				mb = div_u64_rem(tmp_mb, 1000, &kb);
+				debugf0("CH#%d RIR#%d INTL#%d, offset %u.%03u GB (0x%016Lx), tgt: %d, reg=0x%08x\n",
 					i, j, k,
-					tmp_mb / 1000, tmp_mb % 1000,
+					mb, kb,
 					((u64)tmp_mb) << 20L,
 					(u32)RIR_RNK_TGT(reg),
 					reg);
@@ -849,6 +858,7 @@ static int get_memory_error_data(struct
 	u8			ch_way,sck_way;
 	u32			tad_offset;
 	u32			rir_way;
+	u32			mb, kb;
 	u64			ch_addr, offset, limit, prv = 0;
 
 
@@ -859,7 +869,7 @@ static int get_memory_error_data(struct
 	 * range (e. g. VGA addresses). It is unlikely, however, that the
 	 * memory controller would generate an error on that range.
 	 */
-	if ((addr > (u64) pvt->tolm) && (addr < (1L << 32))) {
+	if ((addr > (u64) pvt->tolm) && (addr < (1LL << 32))) {
 		sprintf(msg, "Error at TOLM area, on addr 0x%08Lx", addr);
 		edac_mc_handle_ce_no_info(mci, msg);
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -1054,7 +1064,7 @@ static int get_memory_error_data(struct
 	ch_addr = addr & 0x7f;
 	/* Remove socket wayness and remove 6 bits */
 	addr >>= 6;
-	addr /= sck_xch;
+	addr = div_u64(addr, sck_xch);
 #if 0
 	/* Divide by channel way */
 	addr = addr / ch_way;
@@ -1074,10 +1084,10 @@ static int get_memory_error_data(struct
 			continue;
 
 		limit = RIR_LIMIT(reg);
-
-		debugf0("RIR#%d, limit: %Lu.%03Lu GB (0x%016Lx), way: %d\n",
+		mb = div_u64_rem(limit >> 20, 1000, &kb);
+		debugf0("RIR#%d, limit: %u.%03u GB (0x%016Lx), way: %d\n",
 			n_rir,
-			(limit >> 20) / 1000, (limit >> 20) % 1000,
+			mb, kb,
 			limit,
 			1 << RIR_WAY(reg));
 		if  (ch_addr <= limit)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ