[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1438596188-10875-1-git-send-email-vgupta@synopsys.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 15:33:02 +0530
From: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>
To: "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <arc-linux-dev@...opsys.com>,
Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/6] ARC: spinlocks/atomics rework
Hi Peter,
Just running this by you for quick eye balling and also as FYI.
The PREFETCHW workaround for llock/scond livelock was not sufficient after
all and we had to do some work there. Extending testing of quad core FPGA
builds shows things pretty stable, whereas w/o patches some of the LTP tests
(shm_open/23-1) would cause the system to go bonkers.
I need to send this to Linus 4.2-rcx so will appreicate if you could take
a quick peek.
Thx,
-Vineet
Vineet Gupta (6):
Revert "ARCv2: STAR 9000837815 workaround hardware exclusive
transactions livelock"
ARC: refactor atomic inline asm operands with symbolic names
ARC: LLOCK/SCOND based spin_lock
ARC: LLOCK/SCOND based rwlock
ARCv2: spinlock/rwlock/atomics: Delayed retry of failed SCOND with
exponential backoff
ARCv2: spinlock/rwlock: Reset retry delay when starting a new
spin-wait cycle
arch/arc/Kconfig | 5 +
arch/arc/include/asm/atomic.h | 113 +++++--
arch/arc/include/asm/spinlock.h | 551 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
arch/arc/include/asm/spinlock_types.h | 2 +
arch/arc/kernel/setup.c | 4 +
5 files changed, 636 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists