[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55BF4003.3040708@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 11:18:43 +0100
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
CC: Mike Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
Pawel Moll <Pawel.Moll@....com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Move clk-sp810 to assigned clock parents
Hi Stephen,
On 01/08/15 00:44, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> This patch set converts this code to use the assigned-clock-parents
> property instead of doing some interesting stuff in the .prepare
> op. I can route the dts patches through arm-soc but I'd like to take
> the clk patch through clk tree because it removes some usage of the
> struct clk based provider APIs that we're trying to get rid of. Also,
> this is completely untested, so testing would be appreciated.
> Can this be tested with qemu? I haven't tried but I was thinking
> that might be an option.
>
> Cc: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>
> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
>
Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
(Tested the series on Juno R0 and Vexpress TC2 platform)
Regards,
Sudeep
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists