[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150803105433.GC24689@phenom.ffwll.local>
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 12:54:33 +0200
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
To: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/i915: load driver even if debugfs fails
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 02:56:42PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 07:36:12PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > debugfs files are not necessary for the usual operation of the driver
> > and the device. No need to check for the return values from the debugfs
> > file creation. Even if one debugfs file fails to create we try with the
> > next debugfs file and ultimately return success always so that the
> > driver continues to load.
Does this even happen? I'm reluctant to merge patches without real-world
justification.
-Daniel
> > cleanup will clean all the created debugfs files as the list of file
> > that are created are maintained in minor->debugfs_list.
> >
> > Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
> > Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@...torindia.org>
> > ---
> A gentle ping.
>
> regards
> sudip
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists