[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150803124350.GH19282@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 14:43:50 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] nohz: New tick dependency mask
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 06:42:10PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> +unsigned long __tick_nohz_set_tick_dependency(enum tick_dependency_bit bit,
> + unsigned long *dep)
> +{
> + unsigned long prev;
> + unsigned long old = *dep;
> + unsigned long mask = BIT_MASK(bit);
> +
> + while ((prev = cmpxchg(dep, old, old | mask)) != old) {
> + old = prev;
> + cpu_relax();
> + }
> +
> + return prev;
> +}
That's typically called a fetch_or(). The function name, which is
entirely too long, also doesn't suggest a return value.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists