[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150803132358.GA18399@cmpxchg.org>
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 09:23:58 -0400
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
To: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mm: make workingset detection logic memcg aware
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 03:04:22PM +0300, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> @@ -179,8 +180,9 @@ static void unpack_shadow(void *shadow,
> eviction = entry;
>
> *zone = NODE_DATA(nid)->node_zones + zid;
> + *lruvec = mem_cgroup_page_lruvec(page, *zone);
>
> - refault = atomic_long_read(&(*zone)->inactive_age);
> + refault = atomic_long_read(&(*lruvec)->inactive_age);
> mask = ~0UL >> (NODES_SHIFT + ZONES_SHIFT +
> RADIX_TREE_EXCEPTIONAL_SHIFT);
> /*
You can not compare an eviction shadow entry from one lruvec with the
inactive age of another lruvec. The inactive ages are not related and
might differ significantly: memcgs are created ad hoc, memory hotplug,
page allocator fairness drift. In those cases the result will be pure
noise.
As much as I would like to see a simpler way, I am pessimistic that
there is a way around storing memcg ids in the shadow entries.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists