[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55BF707F.7020208@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 09:45:35 -0400
From: David Long <dave.long@...aro.org>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Pratyush Anand <panand@...hat.com>,
"steve.capper@...aro.org" <steve.capper@...aro.org>,
"wcohen@...hat.com" <wcohen@...hat.com>
CC: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux@....linux.org.uk" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
"srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"vijaya.kumar@...iumnetworks.com" <vijaya.kumar@...iumnetworks.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"oleg@...hat.com" <oleg@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V2 00/10] ARM64: Uprobe support added
On 08/03/15 09:43, David Long wrote:
> On 08/03/15 07:09, Will Deacon wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 04:58:47AM +0100, Pratyush Anand wrote:
>>> These patches have been prepared on top of ARM64 kprobe v7 patches [1].
>>> Keeping as RFC, because kprobe-v7 still need to be ACKed.
>>
>> Unfortunately, I've not seen any movement on the kprobes patches
>> recently,
>> so this is out of the picture for 4.3.
>>
>> Dave: did you plan to respin your series after Steve's comments on v7?
>>
>> Will
>>
>
> Catalin's comments last week helped me clarify in my own mind that we
> should be able to simplfy the register pushing somewhat. Will, does that
> also make sense to you?
>
^^ That question was aimed at Will Cohen, just to clarify.
> So, also taking into consideration Steve's suggestions about
> reorganizing the asm code, I am now working on a new revision.
>
> -dl
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists