[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1438614540.13460.112.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 09:09:00 -0600
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Cc: iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, dwmw2@...radead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] iommu/vt-d: Report superpage support in sysfs
On Mon, 2015-08-03 at 16:30 +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 03:25:04PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > We already have the VT-d capability register printed raw, but it
> > typically involves a trip to the code or the spec to figure out
> > whether superpages are supported. Make this easier with "2M_pages"
> > and "1G_pages" sysfs entries that clearly report Y/N.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
>
> Can we make this a generic entry for all iommu types and export a
> pagesize bitmap instead?
Are you suggesting a bitmap in order to have a consistent interface,
independently implemented by each IOMMU driver, or are you suggesting a
common interface implemented by iommu_ops.pgsize_bitmap? The latter is
pretty well broken already. It can't represent different IOMMU hardware
units having different capabilities, and it's broken by drivers like
intel-iommu that don't expose native hardware page sizes, but anything
that can be broken down into native hardware page size, so ~(4k-1).
Programatically, a bitmap is a concise way to expose multiple page
sizes, but for human consumption, it's not an ideal solution. Thanks,
Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists