linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/6] test_bpf: add module parameters to filter the tests to run.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <55BF9822.3070000@iogearbox.net>
Date:	Mon, 03 Aug 2015 18:34:42 +0200
From:	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To:	Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@...ebox.fr>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] test_bpf: add module parameters to filter the tests
 to run.

On 08/03/2015 06:23 PM, Nicolas Schichan wrote:
...
>> Btw, for the range test in prepare_bpf_tests(), you could also reject
>> a negative lower bound index right there.
>
> I thought it was better to have all the sanity checks grouped in
> prepare_bpf_tests() (with the checking of the test_name and test_id parameters
> nearby) ? Also a negative lower bound is meaning that no range has been set so
> all tests should be run.

I just got a bit confused when loading test_range=-100,1 was not rejected, but
they do indeed all run in this case.

Thanks,
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/