[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150803164958.GA17910@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 18:49:58 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: kernel test robot <ying.huang@...el.com>
Cc: lkp@...org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [lkp] [net] 1fbe4b46cac: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2245 at
kernel/sched/core.c:7376 __might_sleep+0x8b/0xa8()
On 07/30, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> Thanks!
>
> I am travelling, I'll send the trivial fix on Monday.
>
> Just in case, this is not a bug, we only need to shut up the warning and we
> even have the special macro for that. I forgot its name, and I don't have the
> kernel sources right now.
Now that I can actually see the code, I think that we should simply remove
__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING) and set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE).
But let me re-check this once again tomorrow, I simply can't understand why
pktgen_thread_worker() does this.
Unless I am totally confused they could be removed right after ef87979c273a2
"pktgen: better scheduler friendliness" which in particular changed the main
loop to use wait_event(). Then later baac167b "pktgen: avoid expensive
set_current_state() call in loop" changed the 1st __set_current_state() to
set RUNNING, and moved the 2nd set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE) outside
the main loop for absolutely no reason.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists